New Regulations Aim to Protect UK Media from Foreign Influence: What You Need to Know922

New Regulations Aim to Protect UK Media from Foreign Influence: What You Need to Know

24 July 2025 at 3:05 am (Europe/London)Regulations

In a significant move to safeguard UK media independence, the government has laid out new regulations under the Enterprise Act 2002, specifically targeting newspaper mergers involving foreign powers. This legislative update is designed to prevent foreign states from exerting undue influence over UK newspapers and news magazines, thereby protecting the democratic fabric and media plurality of the nation.

What’s the Big Change?

The new regulations introduce the Foreign State Influence (FSI) regime, which essentially blocks or reverses mergers if a foreign state could control or influence the policy of a UK newspaper enterprise. This is particularly relevant in situations where a foreign power holds shares or voting rights in a UK newspaper.

Key Exceptions to Note:

  1. State-Owned Investors: If a foreign power holds shares indirectly through a state-owned investor, like a sovereign wealth fund, and the investor holds no more than 15% of the shares, it won't trigger the FSI regime.

  2. Minor Shareholdings: If the foreign power's shares are held by a person associated with the foreign power, such as a relative, and the holding is minimal (no more than 0.1%), it's exempt from the regime.

  3. Investment Funds: Shares held by associated persons via investment funds such as ISAs or SIPPs are also exempt.

Why These Changes?

The introduction of the FSI regime is a proactive measure to curb potential foreign interference in the media, which could threaten free speech and the integrity of democratic processes. By setting these regulations, the UK government aligns with other recent legislative efforts, like the National Security and Investment Act 2021, to fortify national security.

Consultation Insights:

The government consulted widely before finalizing these regulations. Key concerns raised included the need for a broader definition of state-owned investors and the potential chilling effect on foreign investments. Respondents urged for clarity and flexibility to ensure legitimate and passive foreign investments aren’t unfairly penalized.

Impact on Business and Investment:

The regulations aim to strike a balance by allowing legitimate investments while guarding against potential threats. With a 15% threshold for state-owned investors, the government hopes to avoid deterring foreign investment in the UK media sector.

Looking Ahead:

The government is committed to reviewing the FSI regime to ensure it remains effective without imposing unnecessary burdens on businesses. Updates to guidance on media merger provisions will follow, reflecting these new rules and extending them to digital news platforms.

This legislative change underscores the UK’s commitment to protecting its media landscape from foreign influence while still welcoming beneficial investments. As these regulations take effect, stakeholders in the media and investment sectors will need to navigate this new landscape carefully.